Skip to content

Use libdatadog for dotnet#8186

Merged
NachoEchevarria merged 45 commits into
masterfrom
nacho/UseLibDatadogDotnet
Jun 18, 2026
Merged

Use libdatadog for dotnet#8186
NachoEchevarria merged 45 commits into
masterfrom
nacho/UseLibDatadogDotnet

Conversation

@NachoEchevarria

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria commented Feb 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Migrate native dependency from DataDog/libdatadog to DataDog/libdatadog-dotnet v1.3.5.

Reason for change

libdatadog-dotnet is a .NET-specific distribution of libdatadog with a minimal feature preset tailored to the needs of the .NET tracer (profiling, crashtracker, symbolizer, library-config), resulting in smaller binaries and a more focused build. It drops the FFI modules the tracer doesn't use (data-pipeline, log, telemetry, ddsketch, ffe).

Implementation details

  • Updated build/cmake/FindLibdatadog.cmake: version, download URLs, and SHA256 hashes for all 6 Linux/macOS platform variants
  • Updated build/vcpkg_local_ports/libdatadog/portfile.cmake: download URL and SHA512 hashes for both Windows variants (x64, x86)
  • Updated build/vcpkg_local_ports/libdatadog/vcpkg.json: version string to 1.3.5

All download URLs changed from github.com/DataDog/libdatadog to github.com/DataDog/libdatadog-dotnet.

Test coverage

No test changes — this is a dependency version/source update. Existing CI builds and native profiler tests validate the binary compatibility. The v1.3.5 artifacts were additionally verified against official libdatadog v32.0.0 across all 8 platforms: identical package layout and headers, and the exported symbol set is a strict subset (only the intentionally-dropped feature symbols differ — no profiling/crashtracker/library-config/common symbol is missing).

Other details

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria added area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages libdatadog Updates to the libdatadog library and Rust integration labels Feb 10, 2026
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Feb 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-06-18 09:35:22

Comparing candidate commit 7758f8e in PR branch nacho/UseLibDatadogDotnet with baseline commit db226d5 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 61 known flaky benchmarks, 65 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5065.838op/s; -4579.671op/s] or [-5.783%; -5.228%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-6595.277op/s; -6108.117op/s] or [-7.820%; -7.242%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-7905.949op/s; -6521.991op/s] or [-8.039%; -6.631%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.577ms; +304.634ms] or [+149.653%; +151.170%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-50.678op/s; -46.212op/s] or [-9.118%; -8.314%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+380.220ms; +382.070ms] or [+300.397%; +301.858%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+90.869op/s; +94.019op/s] or [+11.981%; +12.396%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+396.845ms; +399.274ms] or [+351.193%; +353.342%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.976%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.211ms; -12.036ms] or [-7.571%; -5.621%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-275736.322op/s; -272323.486op/s] or [-28.154%; -27.806%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.557%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.468ms; -21.585ms] or [-11.803%; -9.626%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-152376.160op/s; -136386.906op/s] or [-21.894%; -19.596%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+8520.094op/s; +11430.068op/s] or [+5.421%; +7.273%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+9124.715op/s; +11817.962op/s] or [+7.269%; +9.415%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+393464.399op/s; +434692.991op/s] or [+13.120%; +14.495%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.351ms; -14.977ms] or [-8.920%; -6.904%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+143718.074op/s; +198888.169op/s] or [+5.705%; +7.894%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.664ms; +300.400ms] or [+149.732%; +150.100%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.195ms; +311.472ms] or [+151.389%; +157.076%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.571ms; +303.180ms] or [+151.404%; +152.719%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.103ms; +296.426ms] or [+144.943%; +145.593%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.714ms; +304.680ms] or [+146.030%; +148.947%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.972ms; +301.869ms] or [+149.925%; +150.874%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+19.723µs; +43.354µs] or [+6.297%; +13.841%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-406.464op/s; -207.618op/s] or [-12.671%; -6.472%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.401ms; +300.230ms] or [+149.432%; +149.845%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+419.974ms; +426.704ms] or [+456.319%; +463.632%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+298.049ms; +350.781ms] or [+226.306%; +266.344%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+250.974ms; +314.431ms] or [+115.395%; +144.573%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-541.315op/s; -488.461op/s] or [-49.048%; -44.259%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+206.595ms; +339.836ms] or [+88.042%; +144.824%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-671.522op/s; -587.996op/s] or [-44.791%; -39.220%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+337.523ms; +353.754ms] or [+201.878%; +211.586%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-417.702op/s; -380.192op/s] or [-29.084%; -26.472%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-186.222µs; -124.451µs] or [-9.433%; -6.304%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+36.712op/s; +53.423op/s] or [+7.247%; +10.546%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.595ms; +305.808ms] or [+152.885%; +153.999%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.732ms; +302.805ms] or [+150.196%; +151.736%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.594ms; +304.130ms] or [+151.006%; +152.782%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.888ms; +301.178ms] or [+150.091%; +151.241%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+17225.777op/s; +18903.994op/s] or [+5.771%; +6.333%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.202ms; +297.710ms] or [+145.964%; +147.204%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.412ms; +307.955ms] or [+154.289%; +156.085%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.296ms; +305.243ms] or [+151.725%; +153.205%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.507ms; +300.527ms] or [+147.782%; +149.785%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+48153.251op/s; +54025.678op/s] or [+9.562%; +10.728%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.329ms; +305.967ms] or [+150.406%; +152.216%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.651ms; -12.969ms] or [-7.743%; -6.031%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+18476.926op/s; +25293.313op/s] or [+5.069%; +6.939%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+16963.248op/s; +22657.661op/s] or [+6.192%; +8.271%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+7.896µs; +53.123µs] or [+1.950%; +13.122%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-20.758KB; -20.735KB] or [-7.572%; -7.564%]
  • unstable execution_time [-26.099µs; +30.530µs] or [-5.158%; +6.034%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-17.499KB; -17.481KB] or [-6.379%; -6.373%]
  • unstable execution_time [-59.023µs; +4.062µs] or [-10.228%; +0.704%]
  • unstable throughput [+4.310op/s; +181.631op/s] or [+0.246%; +10.377%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+7.604µs; +12.083µs] or [+17.973%; +28.561%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5349.685op/s; -3486.431op/s] or [-22.520%; -14.677%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-14.150µs; -6.208µs] or [-21.953%; -9.632%]
  • unstable throughput [+1578.216op/s; +3263.823op/s] or [+9.683%; +20.025%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.735ms; +305.161ms] or [+153.524%; +154.246%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.832ms; +305.149ms] or [+154.141%; +155.320%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.764ms; +301.447ms] or [+149.568%; +150.911%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+32440.021op/s; +40024.132op/s] or [+6.140%; +7.576%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.124ms; +301.351ms] or [+149.087%; +150.196%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.960ms; +301.726ms] or [+150.626%; +151.513%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.643ms; +303.949ms] or [+152.974%; +154.143%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.886ms; +300.599ms] or [+149.584%; +149.940%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61104845.822op/s; +61403364.794op/s] or [+44.500%; +44.718%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+420.880ms; +425.563ms] or [+523.439%; +529.264%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.734ms; +300.808ms] or [+149.501%; +150.036%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+60133.151op/s; +88214.645op/s] or [+5.614%; +8.236%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+45480.533op/s; +64947.318op/s] or [+5.264%; +7.518%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+76082.953op/s; +106495.431op/s] or [+5.889%; +8.243%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+50743.138op/s; +70618.772op/s] or [+5.040%; +7.014%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+57694.995op/s; +62010.948op/s] or [+10.476%; +11.260%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+86368.842op/s; +103999.831op/s] or [+9.650%; +11.619%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8186) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration73.24 ± (73.40 - 73.88) ms73.23 ± (73.31 - 73.65) ms-0.0%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration78.76 ± (78.63 - 79.09) ms76.69 ± (76.55 - 76.91) ms-2.6%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1100.13 ± (1099.68 - 1106.80) ms1116.56 ± (1118.15 - 1128.48) ms+1.5%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.77 ± (22.71 - 22.83) ms22.36 ± (22.32 - 22.40) ms-1.8%
process.time_to_main_ms86.73 ± (86.42 - 87.05) ms84.44 ± (84.23 - 84.64) ms-2.6%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.90 ± (10.90 - 10.91) MB10.92 ± (10.91 - 10.92) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.32 ± (22.28 - 22.36) ms22.63 ± (22.57 - 22.69) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.56 ± (85.34 - 85.79) ms87.84 ± (87.53 - 88.15) ms+2.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.94 ± (10.94 - 10.94) MB10.94 ± (10.94 - 10.94) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms214.43 ± (213.45 - 215.40) ms214.48 ± (213.35 - 215.60) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms540.93 ± (539.57 - 542.29) ms545.67 ± (544.12 - 547.21) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.32 ± (48.28 - 48.36) MB48.36 ± (48.32 - 48.41) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.3%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.30 ± (21.26 - 21.34) ms21.28 ± (21.24 - 21.32) ms-0.1%
process.time_to_main_ms73.77 ± (73.61 - 73.93) ms74.05 ± (73.87 - 74.24) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.63 ± (10.62 - 10.63) MB10.64 ± (10.64 - 10.64) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.37 ± (21.28 - 21.46) ms21.67 ± (21.61 - 21.73) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms75.90 ± (75.49 - 76.32) ms77.41 ± (77.14 - 77.68) ms+2.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.74 ± (10.73 - 10.74) MB10.75 ± (10.75 - 10.75) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms370.42 ± (368.23 - 372.60) ms371.01 ± (368.80 - 373.22) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms548.30 ± (547.06 - 549.53) ms550.02 ± (548.62 - 551.41) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.78 ± (49.76 - 49.80) MB49.73 ± (49.70 - 49.75) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.3%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.44 ± (19.40 - 19.49) ms19.40 ± (19.36 - 19.43) ms-0.2%
process.time_to_main_ms73.25 ± (73.01 - 73.48) ms72.49 ± (72.30 - 72.68) ms-1.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.69 ± (7.68 - 7.70) MB7.69 ± (7.68 - 7.69) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.29 ± (19.25 - 19.33) ms19.20 ± (19.17 - 19.24) ms-0.5%
process.time_to_main_ms73.47 ± (73.32 - 73.62) ms72.91 ± (72.74 - 73.07) ms-0.8%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.73 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB7.73 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms297.44 ± (295.43 - 299.45) ms297.74 ± (295.68 - 299.80) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms493.31 ± (492.33 - 494.29) ms495.52 ± (494.40 - 496.63) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.79 ± (36.77 - 36.82) MB36.81 ± (36.78 - 36.84) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.0%

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration198.02 ± (197.30 - 198.25) ms197.59 ± (197.00 - 197.94) ms-0.2%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration202.18 ± (201.80 - 202.77) ms201.81 ± (201.22 - 202.22) ms-0.2%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1191.48 ± (1191.32 - 1196.71) ms1193.25 ± (1191.58 - 1197.01) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms192.29 ± (191.76 - 192.82) ms192.19 ± (191.74 - 192.64) ms-0.1%
process.time_to_main_ms83.74 ± (83.38 - 84.10) ms83.88 ± (83.56 - 84.21) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.08 ± (16.05 - 16.11) MB16.10 ± (16.07 - 16.12) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.7%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms191.11 ± (190.66 - 191.55) ms191.95 ± (191.56 - 192.35) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms84.62 ± (84.33 - 84.91) ms85.35 ± (85.07 - 85.63) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.15 ± (16.12 - 16.17) MB16.20 ± (16.17 - 16.22) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms381.36 ± (380.00 - 382.71) ms384.81 ± (383.64 - 385.99) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms530.78 ± (529.85 - 531.72) ms530.73 ± (529.79 - 531.67) ms-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed56.99 ± (56.91 - 57.08) MB57.33 ± (57.14 - 57.51) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms194.44 ± (194.08 - 194.81) ms196.59 ± (196.08 - 197.09) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.75 ± (71.53 - 71.97) ms71.87 ± (71.62 - 72.12) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.38 ± (16.35 - 16.40) MB16.39 ± (16.36 - 16.42) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms194.15 ± (193.76 - 194.54) ms195.40 ± (195.02 - 195.78) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.47 ± (72.30 - 72.64) ms73.29 ± (73.07 - 73.52) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.41 ± (16.36 - 16.47) MB16.44 ± (16.42 - 16.47) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.1%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms584.35 ± (581.64 - 587.06) ms589.18 ± (586.79 - 591.58) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms536.36 ± (535.45 - 537.28) ms540.60 ± (539.53 - 541.67) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.12 ± (61.04 - 61.21) MB61.21 ± (61.10 - 61.31) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms192.81 ± (192.45 - 193.16) ms195.64 ± (195.21 - 196.06) ms+1.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.11 ± (70.87 - 71.36) ms72.12 ± (71.87 - 72.36) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.69 ± (11.66 - 11.71) MB11.75 ± (11.73 - 11.77) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms191.64 ± (191.32 - 191.95) ms194.40 ± (193.95 - 194.86) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.77 ± (71.64 - 71.89) ms73.13 ± (72.91 - 73.34) ms+1.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.76 ± (11.73 - 11.78) MB11.78 ± (11.76 - 11.79) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.7%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms516.76 ± (514.42 - 519.09) ms513.23 ± (510.74 - 515.73) ms-0.7%
process.time_to_main_ms485.29 ± (484.60 - 485.98) ms492.38 ± (491.58 - 493.19) ms+1.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.67 ± (50.64 - 50.70) MB50.54 ± (50.50 - 50.58) MB-0.3%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count29 ± (29 - 29)30 ± (29 - 30)+0.9%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8186) - mean (73ms)  : 71, 76
    master - mean (74ms)  : 70, 77

    section Bailout
    This PR (8186) - mean (77ms)  : 75, 79
    master - mean (79ms)  : 75, 82

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8186) - mean (1,123ms)  : 1043, 1204
    master - mean (1,103ms)  : 1050, 1156

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8186) - mean (114ms)  : 110, 117
    master - mean (117ms)  : 110, 123

    section Bailout
    This PR (8186) - mean (118ms)  : 112, 123
    master - mean (115ms)  : 110, 120

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8186) - mean (797ms)  : 779, 815
    master - mean (792ms)  : 764, 820

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8186) - mean (102ms)  : 98, 105
    master - mean (102ms)  : 99, 104

    section Bailout
    This PR (8186) - mean (106ms)  : 101, 111
    master - mean (104ms)  : 91, 118

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8186) - mean (950ms)  : 914, 985
    master - mean (947ms)  : 903, 991

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8186) - mean (100ms)  : 96, 104
    master - mean (101ms)  : 96, 106

    section Bailout
    This PR (8186) - mean (100ms)  : 98, 102
    master - mean (101ms)  : 99, 103

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8186) - mean (822ms)  : 786, 859
    master - mean (819ms)  : 785, 854

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8186) - mean (197ms)  : 192, 203
    master - mean (198ms)  : 191, 205

    section Bailout
    This PR (8186) - mean (202ms)  : 196, 207
    master - mean (202ms)  : 197, 208

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8186) - mean (1,194ms)  : 1156, 1232
    master - mean (1,194ms)  : 1155, 1233

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8186) - mean (285ms)  : 277, 293
    master - mean (285ms)  : 278, 292

    section Bailout
    This PR (8186) - mean (286ms)  : 279, 293
    master - mean (285ms)  : 277, 292

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8186) - mean (954ms)  : 934, 975
    master - mean (951ms)  : 934, 967

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8186) - mean (277ms)  : 271, 284
    master - mean (275ms)  : 269, 280

    section Bailout
    This PR (8186) - mean (277ms)  : 272, 282
    master - mean (275ms)  : 270, 280

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8186) - mean (1,161ms)  : 1127, 1196
    master - mean (1,152ms)  : 1116, 1188

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8186) - mean (278ms)  : 270, 285
    master - mean (274ms)  : 269, 279

    section Bailout
    This PR (8186) - mean (277ms)  : 268, 286
    master - mean (273ms)  : 269, 277

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8186) - mean (1,039ms)  : 1000, 1079
    master - mean (1,033ms)  : 993, 1074

Loading

@lucaspimentel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

libdatadog-dotnet is a .NET-specific fork of libdatadog

This makes it sound like this repository is a fork of libdatadog 😅

@datadog-prod-us1-5

This comment has been minimized.

NachoEchevarria and others added 3 commits May 20, 2026 11:31
Update version and download checksums (6x SHA256 for Linux/macOS, 2x SHA512 for Windows) to the libdatadog-dotnet v1.3.5 release.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (apart from spurious files)! :shipit:

Comment thread docs/development/GitLabMigration.md Outdated
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria marked this pull request as ready for review June 4, 2026 13:26
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria requested a review from a team as a code owner June 4, 2026 13:26

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2e56e3891e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread build/cmake/FindLibdatadog.cmake
Comment thread build/cmake/FindLibdatadog.cmake

@gleocadie gleocadie left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you update the bump-libdatadog skills too please ?
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet/tree/master/.claude/skills/bump-libdatadog

The native dependency now comes from DataDog/libdatadog-dotnet, not upstream DataDog/libdatadog. Update the skill + helper script: retarget release URLs/API, clarify the libdatadog-dotnet version scheme (distinct from the upstream version it tracks), make checksum extraction robust to the new release-notes format (split by hash length), drop the removed ByteSlice.cs reference, and note the reduced feature set / unchanged x64 GLIBC 2.15 cap.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@NachoEchevarria

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Can you update the bump-libdatadog skills too please ? https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet/tree/master/.claude/skills/bump-libdatadog

Done! Thanks!

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria merged commit 73f5254 into master Jun 18, 2026
138 checks passed
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria deleted the nacho/UseLibDatadogDotnet branch June 18, 2026 14:42
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Jun 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages libdatadog Updates to the libdatadog library and Rust integration

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants